Daily Weighing and Quick Action Keeps Pounds Off

Successful Diet and Maintaining Weight Loss
Stepping on the scale every day, then cutting calories and boosting exercise if the numbers run too high, can significantly help dieters maintain weight loss, according to results of the first program designed specifically for weight loss maintenance. Study results are published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Unlike other obesity studies, which focus on how to lose weight, the "STOP Regain" trial tested a method that taught participants how to keep those pounds from coming back - regardless of the method they used to lose the weight in the first place.
Led by Rena Wing, professor of psychiatry and human behavior at Brown Medical School and director of the Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center at The Miriam Hospital, the study taught successful dieters a technique called "self-regulation." With the goal of maintaining their weight within five pounds, participants were taught to weigh themselves daily and use the information from the scale to determine if they needed to adjust their diet or exercise routine.
The intervention worked: Significantly fewer participants regained five or more pounds during the 18-month-long program. The program was most successful when delivered in face-to-face meetings, although the Internet also proved a viable way to help participants maintain their weight loss.
"If you want to keep lost pounds off, daily weighing is critical," Wing said. "But stepping on the scale isn't enough. You have to use that information to change your behavior, whether that means eating healthier or walking more. Paying attention to weight - and taking quick action if it creeps up seems to be the secret to success."
"We know that losing weight and keeping weight off is very tough for many people," said Robert J. Kuczmarski, director of the Obesity Prevention and Treatment Program at the National Institutes of Health. "However, the results of STOP Regain show that there are definite actions that people can take before their weight begins to creep upward. Weight control and better health are not one-shot deals and this study will help people see that."
In the study, Wing and her team enrolled 314 participants who'd lost at least 10 percent of their body weight - averaging nearly 20 percent of their body weight or 42 pounds - within the last two years. A third of participants were assigned to a control group and received quarterly newsletters about eating and exercise in the mail for the duration of the study period.
The other two-thirds were assigned to groups that would test the weight maintenance program. One third received the intervention over the Internet, the final third in face-to-face group meetings. Whether delivered over the computer, or in person, the education and support program was virtually identical.
Participants were taught strategies specific to prevent weight regain, many gleaned from Wing's National Weight Control Registry, a database of more than 5,000 people who have successfully lost weight and kept it off for at least one year. Strategies taught in the trial included eating breakfast, getting an hour of physical activity each day and regular weighing - participants were given a scale and urged to use it daily. They also reported their weight weekly, either over the Internet or by phone, depending on the study group.
Participants were also introduced to a weight-monitoring system based on color zones. If they were within three pounds of their starting weight after the weekly check-in, they were in the "green zone" - and received encouraging phone messages and green rewards, from mint gum to a dollar bill. If they'd gained between three and four pounds, they landed in the "yellow zone" and were instructed to tweak their eating habits or exercise routine.
If they gained five pounds or more, they were in the "red zone" and encouraged to restart active weight-loss efforts. They were urged to pull out a red toolbox they received at the start of the program that included items such as a meal replacement shake, a pedometer, a diet diary and their own weight success loss story. "Red zone" residents also had the chance to get one-on-one counseling by phone, email or in person.
Both groups attended weekly meetings for the first month of the study period, then monthly meetings either in groups or via a computer chat room. Internet participants received a laptop computer, an Internet connection and technical support.
Results were resounding: In the control group, 72 percent of participants gained five or more pounds during the year and a half study period. But only 55 percent of Internet participants and 46 percent of meeting participants gained back that much weight.
"The Internet intervention worked, but the face-to-face format produced the best outcomes," Wing said. "Both were successful because the message that people got pay attention to your weight, then take action to maintain it was effective. People were told to take personal control of their health and were given the tools to do it. And they kept off the weight."
The authors note that daily weighing was strongly associated with prevention of weight gain, but only in the Internet and face-to-face groups. Intervention participants who weighed themselves daily had an 82 percent reduction in the odds of regaining five or more pounds. However, daily weighing in the control group had little to no effect on the amount of weight regained.
"This suggests that participants in the two intervention groups were able to use the information from the scale to make constructive changes in their eating and exercise behaviors," says Wing. "It's further evidence that getting on the scale each day is only part of the solution."
Wing and her team conclude that the concept of an intervention exclusively designed for weight-loss maintenance is an important approach to the successful treatment of obesity. Future studies should examine ways to refine the Internet format, as well as test interventions designed to last longer than 18 months.